Supabase alternatives · honest verdict

The Best Supabase Alternatives in 2026 (and When You Don't Need to Switch)

Supabase is one of the few backend tools we genuinely like. Postgres, auth, storage, edge functions, and realtime for $25 a month is a stupid-good deal, and for most early-stage apps you should just use it and ship. We are not here to talk you out of a tool that works.

But Supabase is not free of trade-offs. The Pro plan starts at $25 and quietly climbs once your database, bandwidth, and function calls grow, so most production apps land closer to $35 to $75. Its client SDKs and auth get harder to rip out the longer you stay. And sometimes you need less than Supabase (just a database) or more than it (infrastructure you actually own). Those are the only real reasons to leave. Here are the five alternatives that earn the switch.

The contenders we put against Supabase

N
Neon
C
Convex
A
Appwrite
P
PocketBase
F
Firebase

The verdict

If Supabase is working, do not switch for the sake of it. Migrations are expensive and you will spend a week moving auth alone. Switch only when you have outgrown the bundle: go to Neon if you just need Postgres and your own auth (Clerk, Auth0) and want scale-to-zero and database branching. Go to Convex if you are building a heavily realtime, TypeScript-first app and SQL is not a hard requirement. Go to Appwrite or PocketBase if you want to self-host and own your stack outright. Go to Firebase only if you are mobile-first and your data is document-shaped, not relational. For everyone else: Supabase is still the right default in 2026.

0

Supabase alternatives worth a look

0

with a genuinely free tier

$0.0/mo

cheapest paid plan

Starting price, per user / month

Neon
$0.00
Convex
$0
Appwrite
$0
PocketBase
$0
Firebasefree tier
$0

The picks that earn their seat

01

Neon

Serverless Postgres with git-style database branching and scale-to-zero. It is the database half of Supabase, minus auth, storage, and the lock-in.

$ Free tier with 0.5 GB storage, 100 compute-hours, and scale-to-zero always on. Paid plans (Launch and Scale) are usage-based: roughly $0.10 per CU-hour of compute and $0.35 per GB-month of storage. Storage pricing dropped sharply after Databricks acquired Neon in 2025. Pricing verified June 2026.
Use when
You already run your own auth (Clerk, Auth0, NextAuth), you want a branch of your database per pull request, or you are cost-sensitive and want to stop paying when idle. Standard Postgres wire protocol means almost zero migration risk.
Skip when
You actually want the all-in-one bundle. Neon is only the database. You will be wiring up auth, storage, and realtime yourself, which is exactly the work Supabase does for you.
02

Convex

A reactive, TypeScript-native backend where your queries are functions and the UI updates itself. A genuinely different model, not a Supabase clone.

$ Free developer plan with resource and member caps. The Professional plan is $25 per month per seat plus usage overages. Convex added an Enterprise tier in April 2026 (Business plan from $2,500/month). Pricing verified June 2026.
Use when
You are building a highly interactive realtime app (collaboration, live dashboards, chat) and your team loves TypeScript. Realtime is on by default with consistency guarantees Supabase Realtime does not give you out of the box.
Skip when
You need real Postgres and SQL. Convex uses a custom document store, so you are trading SQL familiarity and portability for developer experience. That is moderate lock-in, even though the backend is now open-source.
03

Appwrite

Open-source, self-hostable BaaS with the full Supabase feature set: database, auth, storage, functions, plus both REST and GraphQL.

$ Free to self-host (Docker), forever. Appwrite Cloud has a free tier and a Pro plan that moved to $25 per month per project as of September 2025 (up from $15). Pricing verified June 2026.
Use when
Vendor lock-in is a real concern for your org and you want to own the whole backend on your own infrastructure. The self-hosted version is a complete platform with no per-seat tax.
Skip when
You are Postgres-committed. Appwrite is MariaDB-based, so it is not a drop-in for SQL-heavy Supabase apps. Self-hosting also means you now own the uptime, backups, and patching.
04

PocketBase

A single Go binary that gives you a database, auth, file storage, realtime, and an admin UI. Dead-simple to deploy, free forever.

$ Free and open-source (MIT license). You pay only for hosting: a $5 VPS runs it comfortably for small projects. Managed hosting exists via third parties like PocketHost if you do not want to run it yourself. Pricing verified June 2026.
Use when
You are building internal tools, prototypes, or a small-to-medium app and want zero platform overhead. One binary, SQLite, no Kubernetes, no monthly SaaS bill. Hard to beat for the long tail of small projects.
Skip when
You expect heavy concurrent writes or large scale. SQLite has a single-writer model, and the community is smaller than Supabase's. Wrong tool for a high-throughput production system.
05

Firebase

Google's original BaaS. Unmatched mobile SDKs, offline sync, and realtime, built around a NoSQL document database instead of Postgres.

$ Generous free Spark plan. The pay-as-you-go Blaze plan has no fixed monthly fee but bills on usage and can spike unpredictably at scale. Pricing verified June 2026.
Use when
You are building mobile-first, you need rock-solid offline sync, and your data is document-shaped rather than relational. Firebase's mobile SDKs are still the best in the business.
Skip when
You want relational data, SQL, or to avoid Google lock-in. Firestore is NoSQL, the pricing surprises are legendary, and migrating off the Google ecosystem is painful. The opposite of Supabase's Postgres pitch.

🔥 Free tool, no signup

On Supabase too? See what your whole stack scores.

Pick your tools, get a Stack Bloat Score, your real annual bill, and a roast you probably deserve. Then exactly what we'd cut. We roast the bloat, not you.

Roast my stack

✂ What to cut first

Here is the cut nobody selling you a 'backend platform' will mention: most teams are over-buying. If you only need a database, you are paying for auth and storage you wired up yourself anyway, so cut Supabase down to Neon and pocket the difference. If you are a solo founder or a tiny team shipping internal tools, cut the managed SaaS entirely and run PocketBase on a $5 box. And before you migrate anything, cut the urge to switch at all: a platform migration costs you a week minimum, mostly spent re-implementing auth. The smartest move is usually the cheapest one, which is staying on Supabase until it actually hurts. Nobody pays us to say that.

FAQs

What is the best Supabase alternative if I only need a database?+

Neon. It is pure serverless Postgres with git-style branching and scale-to-zero, and it speaks the standard Postgres wire protocol so migration risk is minimal. Bring your own auth (Clerk, Auth0, or NextAuth) and you have stripped Supabase down to just the part you actually use. CockroachDB Serverless is the alternative if you need multi-region, high-availability distribution.

Is there a free, open-source alternative to Supabase?+

Two strong ones. Appwrite is a full open-source BaaS (database, auth, storage, functions, REST and GraphQL) that you self-host with Docker for free. PocketBase is even simpler: a single Go binary with database, auth, storage, and realtime built in, MIT-licensed and free to run on any cheap VPS. Supabase itself is also open-source and self-hostable if you want to stay on Postgres but stop paying the managed bill.

How much does Supabase actually cost beyond the $25 Pro plan?+

The Pro plan starts at $25 per month, but it is usage-based on top of that. Once you exceed the included limits (8 GB database, storage, edge function invocations, realtime connections), most small-to-medium production apps land in the $35 to $75 per month range. The Team plan jumps to $599 per month for SOC 2 and compliance features. Project your costs against expected growth before assuming $25 is the real number. Pricing verified June 2026.

Should I switch from Supabase to Firebase?+

Only if you are mobile-first and your data is document-shaped rather than relational. Firebase has the best mobile SDKs and offline sync in the business. But Firestore is NoSQL, the Blaze plan can produce surprising bills at scale, and you are locking into the Google ecosystem. If you chose Supabase specifically for Postgres and SQL, Firebase is a step in the wrong direction.

When should I NOT switch away from Supabase?+

Most of the time. If your app is a standard full-stack web app, you want Postgres with minimal setup, and the pricing fits, staying put is the smart move. Platform migrations are expensive, and re-implementing auth alone can eat a week. Switch only when you have genuinely outgrown the bundle: you need just a database (Neon), heavy realtime (Convex), full self-hosting (Appwrite, PocketBase), or mobile-first NoSQL (Firebase).

Don't just swap a tool, wire the whole stack

Picking Supabase's replacement is step one. The wiring is the win.

See how this tool fits into a full, tested stack, and get one wired recipe in your inbox every week.

See the GTM recipes

Researched against: convex.dev · encore.dev · weweb.io · northflank.com · dbpro.app · supabase.com · neon.com · convex.dev · appwrite.io · firebase.google.com · pocketbase.io. Opinions are our own, nobody pays us to recommend anything.